Sharyn Bovat Asked to Disclose Sexual Positions.....The Tennessee Courts Continue to Abuse NISSAN Whistleblower.

Begin forwarded message:

From: Sharyn Bovat <sharynbovat@aol.com>

Subject: NISSAN Whistleblower Will File Objection in Williamson County Court - Being Asked What "Positions" She Had Sex with the Tennessean Editor is an Invasion of Privacy. Bovat Told She HAS to Respond By Filing Documents. Sharyn Feels RAPED By Abusive Questions in Tennessee Courts

Date: March 7, 2013 5:43:52 PM CST

To: "chudler@tennessean.com" <chudler@tennessean.com>, "rdickey@gannett.com" <rdickey@gannett.com>, "csisk@tennessean.com" <csisk@tennessean.com>, "mcass@tennessean.com" <mcass@tennessean.com>, "mike.reynard@mail.house.gov" <mike.reynard@mail.house.gov>, "stockard@dnj.com" <stockard@dnj.com>, "jrlind@nashvillepost.com" <jrlind@nashvillepost.com>, "jridley@nashvillescene.com" <jridley@nashvillescene.com>, steve.allbrooks@mail.house.gov, steve@gillreport.com, Ken Marrero <BlueCollarMuse@gmail.com>, nashvilleteaparty@gmail.com, Jonathan Collegio <jacollegio@americancrossroads.org>, Amelia Chasse <achasse@hynescommunications.com>, Patrick Hynes <phynes@hynescommunications.com>, Arthur Brooks <arthur.c.brooks@aei.org>, Blake Farmer <bfarmer@wpln.org>, Brandon Howell <BHowell@hynescommunications.com>, "Bill.Hagerty@tn.gov" <Bill.Hagerty@tn.gov>, "Will.Alexander@tn.gov" <Will.Alexander@tn.gov>, "will.swaim@franklincenterhq.org" <will.swaim@franklincenterhq.org>

Cc: Sharyn Bovat <sharynbovat@aol.com>, "4msilverman@gmail.com" <4msilverman@gmail.com>

THIS has nothing to do with the issue YET Kline Preston is doing this.  

The list of questions is excessive and ridicules.

Is someone going to report something?  

How much abuse do I have to take? 

Written questions submitted to a party from his or her adversary to ascertain answers that are prepared in writing and signed under oath and that have relevance to the issues in a lawsuit.

Interrogatories are a discovery device used by a party, usually a defendant, to enable the individual to learn the facts that are the basis for, or support, aPleading with which he or she has been served by the opposing party. They are used primarily to determine what issues are present in a case and how to frame a responsive pleading or a deposition. Only parties to an action must respond to interrogatories, unlike depositions that question both parties and witnesses.

Interrogatories are used to obtain relevant information that a party has regarding a case, but they cannot be used to elicit privileged communications. The question must be stated precisely to evoke an answer relevant to the litigated issues. A party can seek information that is within the personal knowledge of the other or that might necessitate a review of his or her records in order to answer. The federal rules of Civil Procedure and the rules governing state court proceedings provide that when interrogatories seek disclosure of information contained in corporate records, the party upon whom the request is served can designate the records that contain the answers, thereby making the requesting party find the answer for himself or herself. No party can be compelled to answer interrogatories that involve matters beyond the party's control. Objections to questions submitted can be raised and a party need not answer them until a court determines their validity.